Microsoft

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager Feedback

Suggestion box powered by UserVoice - Update: Microsoft will be moving away from UserVoice sites on a product-by-product basis throughout the 2021 calendar year. We will leverage 1st party solutions for customer feedback. Learn more

Thorsten

My feedback

  1. 39 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  7 comments  ·  Ideas » Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Thorsten commented  · 

    Two years time, problem not solved. Come on Adam, this is an important one.
    Probably it has not that many votes, because of the random nature it primarily affects sites with many boundaries. Also not those using 10.x.x.x IPs only. And, I'm sure, many people probably don't realize the fallback to another boundary's server because they don't read the logs as long as it runs fine 9 out of 10 times.

    @Edd Weaver: Afaik, since W10v1607 there is no need to enable Hyper-V features in order to use the security features that you may refer to. When configuring the security features, the hypervisor layer is automatically enabled. Quick win: no virtual adapter on the machine.
    Ref: Credential guard doc: "Starting with Windows 10, version 1607 and Windows Server 2016, enabling Windows features to use virtualization-based security is not necessary and this step can be skipped."

    Thorsten supported this idea  · 
  2. 106 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback.
    Updating status to planned, see https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/mem/configmgr/core/understand/find-help#send-a-suggestion for an explanation of each value.

    Our 2006 release is now in the opt-in phase (fast ring)
    Blog: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/configuration-manager-blog/update-2006-for-microsoft-endpoint-configuration-manager-current/ba-p/1569562
    Docs: https://docs.microsoft.com/mem/configmgr/core/plan-design/changes/whats-new-in-version-2006
    Support Information: https://aka.ms/cmcssreleaseinfo

    This releases adds the Community Hub https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/mem/configmgr/core/servers/manage/community-hub which addresses some of the User Voice asks you have added for task sequence version control, auditing, revision history etc.
    The Hub is nascent and we will continue to iterate, improving and adding new features.
    As part of this process we would appreciate your comments and feedback on the Hub.

    Thorsten supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Thorsten commented  · 

    +1 especially for undelete/recycler.

    v1906 added the Task Sequence Reference Tab to the Applications List View. It's somewhat useful that you can even right click the TS down there and view or edit it, but you can also unintentionally *delete* it there. (I don't want to try now, if there is another confirmation before deletion.)

    Fortunately (for my client), I've found a useful temporary copy of the TS that they had deleted that way.

    It might be a good idea to not allow deletion of the TS at that part of the console where you think that you only delete an old application or a reference to it. (I could open a new uservioce admin console request for that problem.)

  3. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Ideas » Application Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thorsten shared this idea  · 
  4. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Ideas » Software Center  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Thorsten commented  · 

    Thanks @kheldorn for following up on my old request :)
    :+1:

    By coincidence, one of my customers just asked me to implement the toast from imab.dk for the next OS upgrade. Looking into the code I was happy to see the protocol being used. Not happy, that the last click is not yet automated. Thanks for sharing your use case.

    Thorsten supported this idea  · 
  5. 115 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  8 comments  ·  Ideas » Application Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Thorsten commented  · 

    +1 - I've just talked to a customer that would like to see it.

    Even better if we could apply a recurring availability window, i.e. a maintenance window per application.

  6. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thorsten shared this idea  · 
  7. 13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Thorsten commented  · 

    Although not documented (?), this seems to be working in v1710. Please note, wildcard characters are "*" and "?". "%" does not work.
    I'm using Task sequence variable _SMSTSMachineName like "K-*".

    See also the ConfigMgrTeam comment on https://www.reddit.com/r/SCCM/comments/6zg9az/why_is_there_a_like_condition_for_task_sequence/

Feedback and Knowledge Base