Microsoft

System Center Configuration Manager Feedback

Suggestion box powered by UserVoice

HoustonAU

My feedback

  1. 182 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Ideas » Software Updates  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. 84 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Ideas » Remote Control  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Ideas » Software Updates  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. 815 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  19 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    HoustonAU supported this idea  · 
  5. 392 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    22 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Updating status to started – see https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/core/understand/find-help#send-a-suggestion for an explanation of each value.

    Our 1905 Technical Preview is now released.

    Doc: https://docs.microsoft.com/sccm/core/get-started/2019/technical-preview-1905
    Blog: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/Configuration-Manager-Blog/Group-applications-into-a-single-deployment-in-ConfigMgr/ba-p/624318

    This release has the first round of changes in the App model to allow a Task sequence as a deployment type allowing task sequences to be deployed to users/user groups.
    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/core/get-started/2019/technical-preview-1905#bkmk_tsdt

    HoustonAU commented  · 

    One use case for this is that we would rather have all OSD task sequences assigned to our Support staff. If they are not physically at the machine they can just remote in and run a rebuild rather than having to muck around with collections and groups.

    HoustonAU supported this idea  · 
  6. 1,092 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  19 comments  ·  Ideas » Software Updates  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    HoustonAU commented  · 

    As much as I would love this, it is a far wider problem with the Servicing Stack. This should be resolved at the OS level, not the Config Mgmt level.

    They need to address the entire issue of SSU updates in general, why do we need them, why are they different from other updates, why aren't they identified as SSU in some way etc.

    Fix the updates themselves and we wont need to modify SCCM

  7. 171 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    HoustonAU supported this idea  · 
  8. 338 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  16 comments  ·  Ideas » Software Center  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    HoustonAU supported this idea  · 
  9. 217 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  7 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    HoustonAU supported this idea  · 
  10. 592 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    21 comments  ·  Ideas » Admin Console  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    HoustonAU supported this idea  · 
  11. 1,656 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    93 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    HoustonAU supported this idea  · 
  12. 143 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Ideas » Software Center  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    HoustonAU supported this idea  · 
  13. 873 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    36 comments  ·  Ideas » Application Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    HoustonAU commented  · 

    While this can already be accomplished through creative collections, I think an integrated and supported way to do this would be much better.

    If you need to do this now you can create a collection that includes all devices with the software installed but exclude devices that are in the 'Install' collection, then just do an 'uninstall' deployment to that second collection.

    It works but is a bit of a pain to configure for every application.

    Would be preferable to simply have a tick box on the deployment to say 'Uninstall when item is out of scope' or something similar.

    I also disagree with 'Anonymous', all configuration management software is 'dangerous' if you don't know what you are doing.

    HoustonAU supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base