Microsoft

System Center Configuration Manager Feedback

Suggestion box powered by UserVoice

Kris Titeca

My feedback

  1. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. 47 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Ideas » Setup and Server Infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. 106 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Ideas » Software Updates  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kris Titeca supported this idea  · 
  4. 58 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Ideas » Application Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kris Titeca commented  · 

    I would also suggest to allow the ability to provide a timeframe for the deadline, especially when you opt for making available the software gradually. Having laptops with a deadline in the middle of the night is not the best experience. Of course you can deal with that in other ways but still might be handy.

    Kris Titeca supported this idea  · 
  5. 19 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Ideas » Application Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kris Titeca commented  · 

    Indeed and this is sometimes required in environments with strict change management where the start of each phase needs to be defined upfront.

    Kris Titeca supported this idea  · 
  6. 41 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Ideas » Setup and Server Infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kris Titeca commented  · 

    Alternatively you could provide an option on each site system "Don't use proxy to contact this site system" but not sure if that would be easier to implement.

    Kris Titeca supported this idea  · 
    Kris Titeca commented  · 

    I have the same problem. I would suggest either have an option to define exclusions or be able to specify a proxy pac where you can control everything yourself

  7. 120 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  1 comment  ·  Ideas » Setup and Server Infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kris Titeca supported this idea  · 
  8. 316 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Ideas » Application Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kris Titeca supported this idea  · 
  9. 1,677 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    94 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kris Titeca supported this idea  · 
  10. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Ideas » Troubleshooting & Support  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kris Titeca supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base