Microsoft

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager Feedback

Suggestion box powered by UserVoice - Update: Microsoft will be moving away from UserVoice sites on a product-by-product basis throughout the 2021 calendar year. We will leverage 1st party solutions for customer feedback. Learn more

Mark

My feedback

  1. 865 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  31 comments  ·  Ideas » Application management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mark supported this idea  · 
  2. 320 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  19 comments  ·  Ideas » Application management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mark supported this idea  · 
  3. 130 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Ideas » Software Updates  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mark supported this idea  · 
  4. 1,049 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    43 comments  ·  Ideas » Application management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mark supported this idea  · 
  5. 24 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  6 comments  ·  Ideas » Application management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mark supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark commented  · 

    We try to keep a minimal Task Sequence and therefore have a lot of Applications that flow in after imaging is complete. It feels like the current order is random and I'd love to have the ability to set priority levels for Applications to have some say in what needs to be installed first.

    Some of these Applications are very large and if one of the large ones is processed first the other software may not install until the large one completes.

    I'd prefer to be able to set an Application priority like the OP suggested where higher priority installs are processed first. For instance, a CAD program can wait while a browser is being installed.

    It seems that the current order is set and won't be deviated from. Even if several unrelated Applications have already cached they won't install before a larger still caching item if the larger item has a lower numbered cache folder. At very least it would be great if Applications finished caching could jump the line and be installed as the larger item continues to cache.

  6. 1,956 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    104 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating system deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mark supported this idea  · 
  7. 836 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    15 comments  ·  Ideas » Site deployment and infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Noted  ·  sangeev responded

    Updated to Noted. We’ve been discussing the same in our planning meetings.

    Thanks,
    BobMN on behalf of SangeeV for SCCM OS Deployment

    Mark supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base