Microsoft

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager Feedback

Suggestion box powered by UserVoice

A. Marshall

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Ideas » Setup and Server Infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    A. Marshall supported this idea  · 
  2. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Ideas » Software Center  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    A. Marshall supported this idea  · 
  3. 175 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Ideas » Software Center  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    A. Marshall supported this idea  · 
  4. 19 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Ideas » Application Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    A. Marshall commented  · 

    Omg. This really got more votes than my submission. What the actual freak.

  5. 119 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  11 comments  ·  Ideas » Client Settings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    A. Marshall commented  · 

    An in-house utility had to be built for this, to prevent customers from opting-out completely from SCCM management on their LOB systems.

  6. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Ideas » Software Center  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    A. Marshall shared this idea  · 
  7. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Ideas » Software Updates  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    A. Marshall commented  · 

    Specifically relegate the PREVIEW contents to their own category. Do the same for TARGETED releases and other such updatea and require these to be deliberately enabled beforehand. These are not production ready and should not be offered unless my organization knowingly chooses to opt-in on behalf of the Enterprise.

    Stress that these should be filtered by default to prevent sync with actual production updates, unless the selection is made in the console by AUTHORIZED personnel. Present warnings that flag these as being offered as pre-release only, along with clear disclosures that these will cause increasingly long delays in the update process.

  8. 90 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Ideas » Client Discovery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    A. Marshall supported this idea  · 
  9. 113 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  5 comments  ·  Ideas » Application Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    A. Marshall supported this idea  · 
  10. 201 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Ideas » Client Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    A. Marshall supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base