Microsoft

System Center Configuration Manager Feedback

Suggestion box powered by UserVoice

Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 785 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    14 comments  ·  Ideas » Software Updates  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Noted  ·  sangeev responded

    Updated to Noted. We’ve been discussing the same in our planning meetings.

    Thanks,
    BobMN on behalf of SangeeV for SCCM OS Deployment

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 2,019 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    119 comments  ·  Ideas » Software Center  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 26 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  6 comments  ·  Ideas » Application Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    The problem is not throttling at all, it's that two similar entries in the software center behave different:
    A user initiated download of a *package/program* will be paused when the energy schema changes to "save battery" (since its bits priority is "low"), while a user initiated download of an *application* will resume in that case (since it's "foreground").
    The user isn't aware of the difference between programs and applications...

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 149 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  5 comments  ·  Ideas » Setup and Server Infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 1,280 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    40 comments  ·  Ideas » Compliance Settings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 888 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    36 comments  ·  Ideas » Application Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 1,394 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    24 comments  ·  Ideas » Admin Console  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base