Microsoft

System Center Configuration Manager Feedback

Suggestion box powered by UserVoice

Levi Stevens

My feedback

  1. 322 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  14 comments  ·  Ideas » Compliance Settings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Levi Stevens supported this idea  · 
  2. 440 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  19 comments  ·  Ideas » Collections  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Levi Stevens supported this idea  · 
  3. 736 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    18 comments  ·  Ideas » Remote Control  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Levi Stevens supported this idea  · 
  4. 1,265 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    36 comments  ·  Ideas » Compliance Settings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Levi Stevens supported this idea  · 
  5. 812 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  28 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Levi Stevens commented  · 

    I would also ask, that when checking for content availability, it only checks for content were the step is applicable, or the model is applicable. If I am imaging a Dell Latitude 5591, don't throw up an error because you cannot find the content for the Dell Latitude E6430U model. Some of our sites can take a long time to replicate packages, I would rather not have ALL OSD blocked until the driver package is 100% replicated.

    Levi Stevens supported this idea  · 
  6. 136 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  8 comments  ·  Ideas » Asset Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Levi Stevens commented  · 

    Ran into this issue today. We have a collection based on the AD Computer Description field. The field was cleared in AD, and the computer didn't drop out of the collection because the discovery field in the system class was not cleared. I had to delete the SCCM record and let the client report in again to clear this.

    Levi Stevens supported this idea  · 
  7. 69 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Levi Stevens commented  · 

    This is something I do to optimize my OSD. Including setting the restart timer to 0 with the variable.

  8. 20 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Ideas » Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Levi Stevens commented  · 

    Seeing this issue still on 1710, placing the NO_SMS_ON_DRIVE.SMS does not help

  9. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Ideas » Application Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Levi Stevens shared this idea  · 
  10. 188 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    13 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Updating status to planned.

    We shipped our 1905 Technical Preview today.

    Doc: https://docs.microsoft.com/sccm/core/get-started/2019/technical-preview-1905
    Blog: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/Configuration-Manager-Blog/Group-applications-into-a-single-deployment-in-ConfigMgr/ba-p/624318

    This preview contains the first release of the task sequence debugger. We’ll continue working on it to address more of the asks in this item.

    Levi Stevens commented  · 

    Any update on this?

  11. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the feedback. Updating status to noted.

    The download behavior is from Software Center and would hold true for any deployment using Download and Execute so changing for Task Sequences may have knock on effect for SWD etc.

    One thing you may want to look at it our Task Sequence Pre-Cache available in 1611 Tech Preview https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/core/get-started/capabilities-in-technical-preview-1611#pre-cache-content-for-available-deployments-and-task-sequences – that allow you to pre-cache all statically referenced content ahead of availability time so no download is seen and all content is local. You can also conditionally download OS Upgrade Packages

    Levi Stevens commented  · 

    Bob - We may not always want to pre-cache content, and I think it would be GREAT if you also provided a download status for all in-progress downloads via Software Center, if there are 9 patches and 3 software packages in the download queue, show the download status for all of them! The task sequence should just "aggregate" these when running a Task Sequence.

    Levi Stevens shared this idea  · 
  12. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Ideas » Software Updates  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Levi Stevens shared this idea  · 
  13. 310 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    14 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Levi Stevens commented  · 

    This would be huge. We use TS for our Office 365 and CRM rollouts, and don't really want users logging back on until it is finished.

    Levi Stevens supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base