Microsoft

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager Feedback

Suggestion box powered by UserVoice

Phil

My feedback

  1. 15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Phil commented  · 

    This has become of even more interest now that 1802TP includes delivery of in-place upgrade task sequences via Cloud Management Gateway

    Phil shared this idea  · 
  2. 341 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Phil commented  · 

    To elaborate further on this, there has been a lot of discussion around CM managed clients that are internet based and leveraging the Cloud Management Gateway. One key feature with CMG is that MS Software Updates deployed via CM will pull their content directly from Windows Update rather than requiring space and bandwidth (ie, cost) of delivery via Cloud DP. For an Upgrade TS, I'm literally downloading the same bits to import for an OS Upgrade Package as are sitting out on the Microsoft servers for WU/WUfB users, yet unlike quality updates I have to distribute 3.5GB of data to my Azure based DP, and any managed clients have to in turn download it from Azure. I can't let CM manage just quality updates and let WUfB handle feature updates; it's all or nothing. CMG behavior for quality updates handles this great, as was the ability in a SUG deployment to have it fall back to Microsoft for updates before that, but in scenarios where an Upgrade TS is desired or required for clients that happen to be internet based, it would be great to have the same behavior.

  3. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  1 comment  ·  Ideas » Deployment Monitoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Phil shared this idea  · 
  4. 414 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    23 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Updating status to started – see https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/core/understand/find-help#send-a-suggestion for an explanation of each value.

    Our 1905 Technical Preview is now released.

    Doc: https://docs.microsoft.com/sccm/core/get-started/2019/technical-preview-1905
    Blog: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/Configuration-Manager-Blog/Group-applications-into-a-single-deployment-in-ConfigMgr/ba-p/624318

    This release has the first round of changes in the App model to allow a Task sequence as a deployment type allowing task sequences to be deployed to users/user groups.
    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/core/get-started/2019/technical-preview-1905#bkmk_tsdt

    Phil supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base