Microsoft

System Center Configuration Manager Feedback

Suggestion box powered by UserVoice

Michael A.

My feedback

  1. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael A. commented  · 

    @Linh
    I gave up to debug this step. It exists also in the current branch

    As I said it works with groups and conditions and to evaluate is the domain join successful I wrote a powershell script, that run after and stop the TS is it not true.

    Michael A. shared this idea  · 
  2. 10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Ideas » Admin Console  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael A. shared this idea  · 
  3. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Ideas » Client Settings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael A. commented  · 

    Same here :( We had that issue in the task sequence. A client tried to download a package from a client that was turned off, after two hours of trying over and over again. We stopped the task sequence manually. I mean this should be a default behavior. It's actually more a bug as an feature request...

    Michael A. supported this idea  · 
  4. 146 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael A. supported this idea  · 
  5. 53 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Ideas » Setup and Server Infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael A. commented  · 

    @Adam
    For the most ist RBAC enough, supporters as example has not to see features that they never use or have to use. For me as an SCCM Administrator, it can be more in-depth. Why have I under "Monitoring\ Component status" a status for Components that are not installed. Why I can Turn on a feature, but I can not turn off? In some situation you like to test a feature in the productivity but after you also like it to turn off again, if you don't use it. Or I like to turn off one that automatically are enabled as example "Surface Driver Update" and I know I will never use this feature because we don't have any surface device...

    Michael A. shared this idea  · 
  6. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Ideas » Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael A. supported this idea  · 
  7. 13 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Ideas » Software Updates  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael A. shared this idea  · 
  8. 16 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Ideas » Software Updates  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael A. supported this idea  · 
  9. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Ideas » Application Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael A. shared this idea  · 
  10. 249 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Ideas » Setup and Server Infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael A. commented  · 

    Any Update? Should not be a big task. Just integrate this one: https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/LAPS-Extension-for-SCCM-e8bd35b1

  11. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Ideas » Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael A. shared this idea  · 
  12. 18 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Ideas » Endpoint Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael A. supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base