Microsoft

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager Feedback

Suggestion box powered by UserVoice

Kazzan

My feedback

  1. 679 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    36 comments  ·  Ideas » Setup and Server Infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kazzan commented  · 

    Really should be addressed. CSP became really growing option to obtain Azure easily and is really unfortunate that CMG does not support this.

    Kazzan supported this idea  · 
  2. 349 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Ideas » Desktop Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kazzan supported this idea  · 
  3. 21 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kazzan commented  · 

    Will be also good if high risk task sequence with deadline will have option to auto-approve warning.

  4. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kazzan supported this idea  · 
  5. 20 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Ideas » Application Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kazzan supported this idea  · 
  6. 40 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Ideas » Software Center  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kazzan supported this idea  · 
  7. 86 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  3 comments  ·  Ideas » Software Center  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kazzan supported this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Ideas » Setup and Server Infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We do document this, and this has been the case since at least SMS 2003.

    See:
    https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/279868/reserved-site-code-names-in-sms-2003-and-configuration-manager
    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/core/servers/deploy/install/prepare-to-install-sites

    I’ve also confirmed that Setup disallows you from using the several “reserved” site code names and has done so since at least 2012 SP2.

    Was unattended setup used? That’s the only way I can think of that may have bypassed this validation.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kazzan commented  · 

    No, it was normal setup and currently allow this name "SMS" even without warning (customer installs latest CB build). Yes, the documentation does not recommend to use them, says that you can experience problems. But unfortunately, customers do not read the docs fully.

    Kazzan shared this idea  · 
  9. 20 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Ideas » Reporting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kazzan supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base