Microsoft

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager Feedback

Suggestion box powered by UserVoice

Jonathan Lefebvre-Globensky

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Ideas » Admin Console  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jonathan Lefebvre-Globensky shared this idea  · 
  2. 28 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Ideas » Admin Console  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jonathan Lefebvre-Globensky supported this idea  · 
  3. 274 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    27 comments  ·  Ideas » Software Updates  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. 63 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Ideas » Setup and Server Infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jonathan Lefebvre-Globensky supported this idea  · 
  5. 49 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  2 comments  ·  Ideas » Admin Console  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jonathan Lefebvre-Globensky supported this idea  · 
  6. 41 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Ideas » Setup and Server Infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jonathan Lefebvre-Globensky supported this idea  · 
  7. 20 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Ideas » Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jonathan Lefebvre-Globensky commented  · 

    Thanks for the suggestion. In scenario like in Retail, it some time can't be possible as all store (pullDP) communicate only with the head office. Additionnal note : it could be only better known process of how all this is processed. I've seen difference on how SCCM 2012 R2 and 2012 R2 SP1 handle large distribution.

    In 2012 R2 : it seemed like concurrent sending was stock at around 70 PullDP.
    In 2012R2 SP1 : it seems more like all or close to for concurrent sending.

    PS : I,ve followed the distribution in the content status

Feedback and Knowledge Base