Microsoft

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager Feedback

Suggestion box powered by UserVoice

Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  2. 673 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  17 comments  ·  Ideas » Software Updates  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 41 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  7 comments  ·  Ideas » Troubleshooting & Support  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    You should see what the log file looks like for Linux machines with the CM agent installed. Yes we are the only company I have ever heard of using the CM agent on Linux in an enterprise environment. Everything is in one file, and its a mess. Now its not condensed and high level, but we would love to have separate log files for Linux, or at least less noise in the one we have.

  4. 19 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Ideas » Client Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I like this. We end up enabling upgrade on clients only. Allow the Scheduled task to get created on them. Then when we are ready to do servers, we shorten the window to 1 day and enable server upgrade. That is as much control as I can get right now and concentrates them into a 24 hour window.

  5. 90 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Ideas » Operating System Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Updating status to started – see https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/core/understand/find-help#send-a-suggestion for an explanation of each value.

    Our recent Technical Previews contain changes for task sequence conditions – you can now Cut, Copy, Paste and reorder (move up/down).

    See https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/core/get-started/2019/technical-preview-1908#bkmk_tscondition for more information

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  1 comment  ·  Ideas » Compliance Settings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I would love this and it would make configmgr much more competitive and comparable to some other tools that offer continuous configuration automation. Not being able to deploy configmgr native objects as part of the compliance remediation is a huge gap in this market when other tools can.

  7. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  2 comments  ·  Ideas » Compliance Settings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I personally use the 'DiscoveredValue' field of the 'vDCMDeploymentNonCompliantRuleDetailsPerClientMachine' and it works great. Just counterintuitive. The approved way to do this is with MOF modifications, using regkeytoMOF to generate it. It works. But I like to stay out of my MOF files unless I need to data for the long term, not just for one off requests.

  8. 21 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Ideas » Compliance Settings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Ideas » Compliance Settings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  10. 1,452 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    24 comments  ·  Ideas » Admin Console  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 58 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Noted  ·  3 comments  ·  Ideas » Application Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

Feedback and Knowledge Base