Microsoft

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager Feedback

Suggestion box powered by UserVoice - Update: Microsoft will be moving away from UserVoice sites on a product-by-product basis throughout the 2021 calendar year. We will leverage 1st party solutions for customer feedback. Learn more

Ideas

What features would you like to see?

All of the feedback that you share in these forums will be monitored and reviewed by the Microsoft engineering teams responsible for building Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, though we canā€™t promise to reply to all posts.

Please do not use UserVoice to report product bugs or for assisted support.
If you believe you have found a product bug, please send us a bug report through the Configuration Manager Console (1806 and newer). To do this, press the šŸ™‚ button in the top right corner and choose ā€œSend a Frownā€. For more details, see https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/core/understand/find-help.

If you require assisted support, please see https://aka.ms/cmcbsupport for more details.

Standard Disclaimer ā€“ our lawyers made us put this here ;-)
We have partnered with UserVoice, a third-party service, so you can give us feedback. Please note that the Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager feedback site is moderated and is a voluntary participation-based project. Please send only feature suggestions and ideas to improve Configuration Manager. Do not send any novel or patentable ideas, copyrighted materials, samples or demos. Your use of the portal and your submission is subject to the UserVoice Terms of Service & Privacy Policy, including the license terms.


  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Support for renaming a site server

    Support for renaming a site server. Our stand-alone primary site server is the last server named by our old server naming conventions.

    16 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinkingā€¦)
    completed  ·  4 comments  ·  Site deployment and infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriateā€¦  ·  Admin →
  2. site restore

    Add a way to perform a site restore to a system with a different name (but keep the same site code). In the event of a Datacenter Move, often times we are not allowed to retain the same system name (location based naming) and we end up having to stand up and entire new infrastructure and migrate.

    While this is doable, it's tedious work and when operating in a Hybrid scenario with Intune, it means that we have to re-enroll the Intune managed clients to a new management authority. It's a whole lot of pain.

    15 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinkingā€¦)
    2 comments  ·  Site deployment and infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriateā€¦  ·  Admin →
    completed  ·  djam responded

    This can be done in #SCCM 1806 with Site Server High Availability – by bring up a new machine with a new name, and making it the passive site server. Then you can fail over to it (making it active), and you can get rid of the original server.

  3. Disable old Ciphers, SSL 3.0, TLS 1.0 and enable TLS 1.1 and 1.2 on all site systems

    On all SCCM 2012 site servers and systems, I want to disable old Ciphers, SSL 3.0, TLS 1.0 and enable TLS 1.1 and 1.2.

    Old Ciphers:
    DES 168/168
    DES 56/56
    RC2 128/128
    RC2 40/128
    RC2 56/128
    RC4 128/128
    RC4 40/128
    RC4 56/128
    RC4 64/128
    Triple DES 168
    Triple DES 168/168

    12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinkingā€¦)
    4 comments  ·  Site deployment and infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriateā€¦  ·  Admin →
  4. Direct Upgrade from SCCM 2012R2 SP1 to 1606 or higher (not via 1511 and then 1606)

    Right now we're having an environment with a CAS and two PRI with 165,000 clients. The hardware is "old" and has to be replaced.
    Everything is running on SCCM 2012 R2 SP1, SQL 2012 and windows server 2008 R2. Now we're planning an upgrade to SCCM 1606 or higher, SQL 2016 and windows server 2016 on different hardware. So far we found some TechNet pages telling us that there are issues with SCCM 1511 and SQL 2016, but SCCM 1606 and SQL 2016 ought to work (There is right now no information about the supportability of windows server 2016 withā€¦

    9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinkingā€¦)
    1 comment  ·  Site deployment and infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriateā€¦  ·  Admin →
    completed  ·  djam responded

    ConfigMgr 1606 was a baseline build. There will be future baseline builds from time to time.

  5. Make the the BranchCache experience more consistent

    Currently, BranchCache can be enabled via client settings, but still has to be enabled on a 'Per Deployment' basis. Applications have it turned on by default - Pkg/Progs do not. I would like to see a similar approach to Peer Cache i.e if enabled in the Client Settings then it should be enabled for all deployments - or at least set to "on" by default across all deployment types. Also, and option to enable BranchCache across all DPs would be useful instead of requiring a checkbox for each one.

    8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinkingā€¦)
    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Site deployment and infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriateā€¦  ·  Admin →
  6. 8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinkingā€¦)
    1 comment  ·  Site deployment and infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriateā€¦  ·  Admin →
    completed  ·  djam responded

    We have tested, and now support MBAM with ConfigMgr 1802+

  7. At last - tell us at which computers an update needs to be deployed

    At the beginning of every hotfix or CU Publishing in the Internet, please start somewhat as follows:

    "This update Needs to be deployed to the following entities":
    CAS (yes/no)
    Admin console computers (yes/no)
    Primary Sites (yes/no)
    Secondary Sites (yes/no)
    Distribution Points (yes/no)
    Management Points (yes/no)
    Software Update Points (yes/no)

    Nowadays it is unbearable having an update news from you but no any clue where to install it!

    7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinkingā€¦)
    0 comments  ·  Site deployment and infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriateā€¦  ·  Admin →
  8. updates and servicing

    The Administration > Cloud Services > Updates and Servicing deserves it's own blade in the console. Given that this is how Current Branch updates are delivered, this is an important piece and shouldn't be buried in the UI.

    7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinkingā€¦)
    0 comments  ·  Site deployment and infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriateā€¦  ·  Admin →
  9. Make ConfigMgr upgrade process resilient

    As of now when an enterprise thinks of upgrade, we have only one thing to do before (TestDBUpgrade). This makes sure if the DB is upgradable. But what if the Upgrade fails at the next step (Copying files). We don't have an option to again run the upgrade only from that step and running from beginning will not work as DB is already upgraded it will fail to find some objects. If this is a CAS site this means you have to again go back to a previous version and recover it and make sure the sites in the hierarchyā€¦

    5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinkingā€¦)
    0 comments  ·  Site deployment and infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriateā€¦  ·  Admin →
  10. automate testdbupgrade

    This may be possible, but I've found no documentation on it. Is it possible to make the testdbupgrade process unattended. I've got 8 primary sites and it takes a considerable amount of time backingup/restoring/testdbupgrade. in preparation for a site upgrade. I'd like to automate it all. The sql part is fine.

    Can testdbupgrade be specified inside the the configmgrautosave.ini ?
    so it could work with a command like this:
    setupwpf.exe /script *configmgrautosave.ini /nouserinput

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinkingā€¦)
    1 comment  ·  Site deployment and infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriateā€¦  ·  Admin →
    completed  ·  djam responded

    TestDBUpgrade can be specified on the command line; and is definitely automatable. During our internal testing, we loop through many databases testing their upgrade… and it’s all silent/automated.

  11. TMG replacement for SCCM IBCM

    TMG is end of life and MS has not provided an alternative yet for SCCM IBCM to manage clients over the Internet. It would be great if alternatives like F5 would be supported for IBCM setup.

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinkingā€¦)
    0 comments  ·  Site deployment and infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriateā€¦  ·  Admin →
  12. Have custom component thresholds values not reset every time we update to a new build

    We've set some custom values for some component thresholds, but every time we update to a new build of sccm, those custom values are reseted to the original by default values.

    So we have to go ahead and change them back everytime, so it would be appreciated if the upgrade process would not override them.

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinkingā€¦)
    completed  ·  2 comments  ·  Site deployment and infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriateā€¦  ·  Admin →
2 Next →
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base