Microsoft

System Center Configuration Manager Feedback

Suggestion box powered by UserVoice

How can we improve Configuration Manager?

Option to uninstall an application when a user or device falls out of scope of the collection

This is a buggy, Would we like the option to have ' Uninstall Application when Resource falls out of scope of this collection' when an application is deployed to a collection, this would save us having to create 2 collections ( install and uninstall) and to deployments. This would save SO much time and reduce the complicity of application management.

870 votes
Vote
Sign in
(thinking…)
Sign in with: Facebook Google
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
Steven John Cuthill shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

36 comments

Sign in
(thinking…)
Sign in with: Facebook Google
Signed in as (Sign out)
Submitting...
  • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    I'd love to see it, primarily for user based assignments. It would be sweet to use automation to pull a user id from an AD group, then have sccm take care of uninstalling the app for you.

  • Law YT commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    Yes. i supporting the idea to give you an option rather default. We don't want all the type of applications uninstall when removed from collection.
    It's just like GPO deployment where there is checkbox "Uninstall when fall out of scope" for you to choose.
    For end user to auto uninstall when out of scope, probably need to build some smart logic behind to ensure it's genuine as i see occasionally something wrong with SCCM which causing collection memberships being removed and trigger uninstallation causing a nightmare. Just imagine you have few thousands users software being removed.

  • Iain Fairbairn commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    You do have to be careful with these kinds of features. I have seen some pretty horrible incidents where people use exclusion collections as a dead mans switch style approach to avoiding having something install or trigger uninstalls (even worse they use direct memberships for exclusion collections....). I am not arguing against the feature at all and would support its inclusion as an option however I would suggest, 1) ensure it is never the default setting to uninstall when out of scope. 2). perhaps have a tooltip and/or popup "are you sure?" type dialogue when someone chooses to switch this on.

  • HoustonAU commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    While this can already be accomplished through creative collections, I think an integrated and supported way to do this would be much better.

    If you need to do this now you can create a collection that includes all devices with the software installed but exclude devices that are in the 'Install' collection, then just do an 'uninstall' deployment to that second collection.

    It works but is a bit of a pain to configure for every application.

    Would be preferable to simply have a tick box on the deployment to say 'Uninstall when item is out of scope' or something similar.

    I also disagree with 'Anonymous', all configuration management software is 'dangerous' if you don't know what you are doing.

  • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    I also think that this would be a very bad idea. There are multitude of scenarios where a resource might get removed from a collection, one of them being accidentally removing it from the console.

  • Thore commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    I love this idea. It would be an big step from an task-based to an status-based deployment solution.

  • Mike Compton commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    @Mirko Colemberg - I DO NOT feel that it is the System Center team's role, to NOT write code in case an admin uses it incorrectly. They do not have the role of policing how we administer our estates.

    If they took that approach, we would not have any OSD solution, in case people accidentally deploy a client OS to their server estate.

    If you regularly accidentally delete computer objects A) change the permissions of your role to prevent this and B) be more careful!

  • ConfigMgrRSC commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    well Kind of dangerous behavior imho. but you can achieve this by creating a uninstall collection and include "all Systems" that you want to behave like this. as Long as a Client is also in the installcollection, the Software will be deployed to this Client. if you drop him out of the install collection - well the uninstall collection will be do the rest

  • John commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    Someone else has a similar suggestion. It's a very good one and shouldn't have the votes for it split.

  • Steve commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    Simple enough - you can set applications to deploy to collections but there is no way for those applications to be removed if a user or device is kicked from the collection. This would really help with companies managing their licenses this way.

  • Law YT commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    I fully support this as currently have to developed a customized script on the client machine to monitor policy and once detected being removed then only trigger the uninstall of the application. This getting more complex when using application model especial optional deployment.

  • Steven John Cuthill commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    Agreed it can be a powerful feature but with some improvements in how the system can remember object ID collection memberships of the object is deleted would make some of this a less of a concern. Good change controls would provent more. It's just to complex to set up an uninstall competed to other vendors and group policy.

  • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    that's what SMS 1.2 (or 2.0, don't remember) had, and it was responsible for uninstalling unintentionally applications. Dangerous.

  • Mirko Colemberg commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    i thinnk this is not a god idea, in case some admin delete a client object in the konsole this object will loose all direct meberships of all collections and in this case the computernwill uninstall all software. this could be difficult.

2 Next →

Feedback and Knowledge Base