Microsoft

System Center Configuration Manager Feedback

Suggestion box powered by UserVoice

Ideas

What features would you like to see?

All of the feedback that you share in these forums will be monitored and reviewed by the Microsoft engineering teams responsible for building System Center Configuration Manager, though we can’t promise to reply to all posts.

If you believe you have found a product bug, please use Feedback Hub. For more details, see: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/core/understand/find-help.

Standard Disclaimer – our lawyers made us put this here ;-) We have partnered with UserVoice, a third-party service, so you can give us feedback. Please note that the System Center Configuration Manager feedback site is moderated and is a voluntary participation-based project. Please send only feature suggestions and ideas to improve Microsoft Configuration Manager. Do not send any novel or patentable ideas, copyrighted materials, samples or demos. Your use of the portal and your submission is subject to the UserVoice Terms of Service & Privacy Policy, including the license terms.

How can we improve Configuration Manager?

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. hashdir.exe for SCCM CB SHA256

    The old version of HASHDIR.exe tool doesn't work with new version of SCCM. This could be because of SHA256 hashing of SCCM CB.
    Is there any possibility to release a new version HASHDIR.exe tool for SHA256 hashed content. This would be really useful whenever SCCM admins want to perform has miss match troubleshooting ...
    This concern was raised by Stefan - https://twitter.com/stefan_farnik/status/1030075218365227008

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    • pull distribution source

      I would suggest one pull distribution poin to pull content from more than one source DP at the same time.

      1 vote
      Vote
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        Signed in as (Sign out)
        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
        0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
      • content distribution settings groups

        Like many things in SCCM you can create groups/collections to manage settings for several objects at once.

        It would be useful to be able to create 'content distribution settings groups' that would allow you to specify the distribution settings for a group of applications.

        For example, being able to group together applications/packages that run in a task sequence and using the group to set distribution settings to 'High' to ensure content is distributed quicker.

        Or being able to group Update Deployment Packages together.

        By default everything could be added to a 'default' group with 'Medium' settings.

        1 vote
        Vote
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          Signed in as (Sign out)
          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
          0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
        • Include a "Differential Size (KB)" and "Incremental Version Number" as optional Column Choices

          "Configuration Manager supports up to five incremental versions of a content set before it resends the entire content set"

          Reference: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/core/plan-design/hierarchy/fundamental-concepts-for-content-management

          "Incremental Version Number" would keep track of how many incremental versions (0=Full through 4=4th Incremental) of a package have occurred prior to every 5th content distribution which is when the next entire data sync will occur.

          "Differential Size (KB)" to store the Result of the 'Binary Differential Replication' calculations of 'Source Version X' vs 'Source Version Y'

          These two values would be extremely helpful in calculating future bandwidth requirements as well as calculating approximate content distribution times in Low…

          3 votes
          Vote
          Sign in
          Check!
          (thinking…)
          Reset
          or sign in with
          • facebook
          • google
            Password icon
            Signed in as (Sign out)
            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
            0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
          • Elaborated Bandwidth Throttling

            Currently, we can configure 'time-based' bandwidth throttling, which means we can restrict content transfer for a particular time period and that will be applicable for all days (same). What if, I want to configure different throttling setting for weekends (or may be some other days), during which, there is less load on network and I can loosen up the restriction.

            1 vote
            Vote
            Sign in
            Check!
            (thinking…)
            Reset
            or sign in with
            • facebook
            • google
              Password icon
              Signed in as (Sign out)
              You have left! (?) (thinking…)
              0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
            • Software Center: Show more details regarding package information

              Users are regularly informed via a pop-up that new software is available. If you then open the Software Center, you will see countless entries with status Installed or Available. However, it is not recognizable for the user whether a program listed is suitable for him, whether it represents a new version of a software already used by him or should not even be installed.
              It would be better to let the user know which new software is a new version of an already installed one and, moreover, what features this new software provides. Thus, a distinction for the user would…

              1 vote
              Vote
              Sign in
              Check!
              (thinking…)
              Reset
              or sign in with
              • facebook
              • google
                Password icon
                Signed in as (Sign out)
                You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
              • Update content on Distribution Points – allow use of revision N-1 content in Task Sequences

                We are supporting companies around the globe out of our Configuration Manager; it goes from Australia to Americas. So, we have all the time someone deploying a machine using the OSD task sequence. But we also have to update content used in the Task Sequence.
                If ‘Update Distribution Points’ is started and a new revision is created, the content goes in yellow (in Progress) on all DPs. If you now want to start a Task Sequence, it will fail due to missing content. If some DPs have blackout times, e.g. not allowed to replicate content during daytime, it is even…

                1 vote
                Vote
                Sign in
                Check!
                (thinking…)
                Reset
                or sign in with
                • facebook
                • google
                  Password icon
                  Signed in as (Sign out)
                  You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                  0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                • Documentation: Export config

                  Have a built in script that will export an as built document.
                  Items to export and put into visio docs:
                  Each server config and HW specs
                  Boundary group summary and DP's associated.
                  Highest used Limiting collections and AD user groups with modify access.
                  Slowest SQL queries and scheduled run frequency
                  Number of devices using a DP.
                  Data growth rate for 1 year.

                  3 votes
                  Vote
                  Sign in
                  Check!
                  (thinking…)
                  Reset
                  or sign in with
                  • facebook
                  • google
                    Password icon
                    Signed in as (Sign out)
                    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                  • More Options to configure Boundaries

                    Currently you can only configure Boundaries based on IP Addresses or AD-Sites.
                    However, in some situations it would be great to have more Options.
                    For example, if you manage Clients in multiple protected NAT Environments.
                    It´s possible that multiple sites/zones use the same IP Ranges, so you cannot configure Clients to use local DPs.
                    A possibility would be a Reg Key like HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\CCM:AllowedMPs, but for Boundary Groups.

                    3 votes
                    Vote
                    Sign in
                    Check!
                    (thinking…)
                    Reset
                    or sign in with
                    • facebook
                    • google
                      Password icon
                      Signed in as (Sign out)
                      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                      0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                    • When Deleting packages from SCCM Console it leaves the empty custom folder in the DP and only Delete the content of the folder.

                      Custom folder created during package creation should also get deleted from DP when the package is being deleted.
                      As of now whenever a package is deleted from console it deletes the content of the folder but leaves the empty folder itself.
                      These empty folder has to be manually identified and then cleared from the DPs.
                      This process of identifying and deleting empty folders is cumbersome specially when having large number of DPs and requires special attention while doing in order to avoid removing any of the working folders mistakenly.

                      6 votes
                      Vote
                      Sign in
                      Check!
                      (thinking…)
                      Reset
                      or sign in with
                      • facebook
                      • google
                        Password icon
                        Signed in as (Sign out)
                        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                        0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                      • Phased Deployments - Allow more than 2 collections to deploy to in ConfigMgr 1802

                        Whilst i know the feature for phased TS deployments is only pre-release in 1802. It'd be super useful to be able to add additional collections into phased deployments as opposed to only being able to use 2 collections.

                        I regularly run 4/5 phase deployments to the enterprise, and in some cases office by office. Having phased deployments support more than just 2 collections would be a massive time saver.

                        5 votes
                        Vote
                        Sign in
                        Check!
                        (thinking…)
                        Reset
                        or sign in with
                        • facebook
                        • google
                          Password icon
                          Signed in as (Sign out)
                          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                          0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                        • Peer Caching Boundary Groups

                          ConfigMgr Team, your best practice document regarding the set up of boundary groups actually breaks peer caching.

                          https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/core/servers/deploy/configure/define-site-boundaries-and-boundary-groups

                          To quote: "it is a best practice to create a separate set of boundary groups to use only for site assignment."

                          This is good advise, and I use this also for Management Points and Software Update Points so that if I add or remove a site system, I only have to modify 1-2 boundary groups instead of 150.

                          Since Peer Caching is now based on Boundary Groups, if you have implemented this best practice, then effectively every client in a site that…

                          28 votes
                          Vote
                          Sign in
                          Check!
                          (thinking…)
                          Reset
                          or sign in with
                          • facebook
                          • google
                            Password icon
                            Signed in as (Sign out)
                            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                            0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                          • Set a Distribution Point to Maintenance

                            I would like an option to set a DP to "maintenance" so that if it is down for whatever reason for an extended period of time that the Primary server does not try to distribute data to it. Also the DP Group monitoring and such would reflect a more realistic % of bad packages.

                            e.g. We have a server in Mexico that is down for the next 5 weeks due to a network issue. While we continue to deploy software to our other 200 server this Mexico server is still being pushed data and being retried over and over due…

                            3 votes
                            Vote
                            Sign in
                            Check!
                            (thinking…)
                            Reset
                            or sign in with
                            • facebook
                            • google
                              Password icon
                              Signed in as (Sign out)
                              You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                              0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                            • Put rate limit on pull distribution point

                              You can not configure rate limits on pull distribution point only on non pull distribution points. this is an issue In many environments. please add the rate limit function to pull distribution point

                              9 votes
                              Vote
                              Sign in
                              Check!
                              (thinking…)
                              Reset
                              or sign in with
                              • facebook
                              • google
                                Password icon
                                Signed in as (Sign out)
                                You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                              • windows 10 wake up

                                Please add support for Windows 10 client to be a WOL proxy!
                                Today Windows 10 clients cant be a wake up proxy, "The supported clients are Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows Server 2012."

                                Kind of sad its not already supported!

                                Regards
                                Robert

                                3 votes
                                Vote
                                Sign in
                                Check!
                                (thinking…)
                                Reset
                                or sign in with
                                • facebook
                                • google
                                  Password icon
                                  Signed in as (Sign out)
                                  You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                  0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                • Fix problem with Peer Cache only working via HTTPS since CB 1710

                                  We noticed 2 things making it impossible for us to use Peer Cache:
                                  In CB 1702, we noticed that clients contacting the Peer Cache Source only attempt this via HTTPS.
                                  This doesn't make sense, especially because we (and most of the other customers we know) use HTTP for the entire SCCM infrastructure.
                                  Furthermore, in the client settings the option to switch from HTTPS to HTTP was obviously forgotten - it's missing.

                                  Is the PG aware of this, and can we expect the issues will be fixed in CB 1802?

                                  11 votes
                                  Vote
                                  Sign in
                                  Check!
                                  (thinking…)
                                  Reset
                                  or sign in with
                                  • facebook
                                  • google
                                    Password icon
                                    Signed in as (Sign out)
                                    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                    2 comments  ·  Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                  • Change Default Content Distribution Priority

                                    Please create a setting (perhaps hierarchy or site) that allows an administrator to define the default content priority by content type. The current system default of Medium is not always appropriate and making this configurable could be a big help. The setting for this is already contained in WMI for most content types so creating a configurable setting in the console should be relatively trivial.

                                    1 vote
                                    Vote
                                    Sign in
                                    Check!
                                    (thinking…)
                                    Reset
                                    or sign in with
                                    • facebook
                                    • google
                                      Password icon
                                      Signed in as (Sign out)
                                      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                      0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                    • Distribution Point - Timezone schedule sync

                                      At the moment when setting up a schedule for Distribution Points to do their syncing the timezone being used is the one from the primary site server.

                                      when having DP's over multiple continents this brings some advanced math to get the sync done right :p

                                      Would there be a possibility to use "Use DP local Time" as with advertisements ?
                                      Or maybe in the schedule tab on the DP properties have a dropdown list with for example "you are now scheduling in GMT+1" where you can select a list of timezones so it does the calculations for you.

                                      1 vote
                                      Vote
                                      Sign in
                                      Check!
                                      (thinking…)
                                      Reset
                                      or sign in with
                                      • facebook
                                      • google
                                        Password icon
                                        Signed in as (Sign out)
                                        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                        0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                      • Client Data Sources

                                        When viewing the client data sources report, it would be nice if the items in the boundary group list box were alphabetically sorted.

                                        1 vote
                                        Vote
                                        Sign in
                                        Check!
                                        (thinking…)
                                        Reset
                                        or sign in with
                                        • facebook
                                        • google
                                          Password icon
                                          Signed in as (Sign out)
                                          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                          0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                        • Improve Content Replication

                                          Content Replication from Site to DPs should be a frustration free Process or SCCM Admins. Unfortunately, I know no customer without smaller or bigger issues in this area.
                                          Here is an uncomplete list of some issues I´ve noticed:
                                          • Content Eval - Scheduled Task lost
                                          o SCCM does not check if the schedule task got lost/deleted
                                          o Suggested Solution: SCCM should verify the Scheduled Task on Service Startup
                                          • Content Eval - Hash mismatch/Eval fails for package
                                          o When content Eval fails for a package, the admin must manually redistribute it / take care of the error
                                          o There should…

                                          153 votes
                                          Vote
                                          Sign in
                                          Check!
                                          (thinking…)
                                          Reset
                                          or sign in with
                                          • facebook
                                          • google
                                            Password icon
                                            Signed in as (Sign out)
                                            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                            2 comments  ·  Content  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                          ← Previous 1 3 4 5 6
                                          • Don't see your idea?

                                          Feedback and Knowledge Base